Impossible Evolution Information

Amazing photons everywhere!

Definitions and Abbreviations:

Basic Time Stats

Amazing Number of Proteins

Human Evolution Time Stats

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (web link)

In research that will help address a long-running debate and apparent contradiction between short- and long-term evolutionary change, scientists have discovered that although evolution is a constant and sometimes rapid process, the changes that hit and stick tend to take a long time.

Give or take a little, one million years seems to be the magic number.

Across a broad range of species, the research found that for a major change to persist and for changes to accumulate, it took about one million years. The researchers wrote that this occujrred repeatedly in a "remarkably consistent pattern." "What's interesting is not that we have so much biological diversity and evolutionary change, but that we have so little," Uyeda said. "It's a paradox as to why evolution should be so slow."

"We believe that for changes to persist, the underlying force that caused them has to also persist and be widespread," Uyeda said.

"This isn't just some chance genetic mutation that takes over," he said. "Evolutionary adaptations are caused by some force of natural selection such as environmental change, predation or anthropogenic disturbance, and these forces have to continue and become widespread for the change to persist and accumulate. That's slower and more rare than one might think."

The exact cause of these long-term, persistent evolutionary changes is not certain. The scientists said that climate change, in itself, does not appear to be a driving force, because many species have remained substantially unchanged over time periods when climates changed dramatically.

If it takes one million years for an evolutionary jump to "stick", then if the first "life" appeared 3.2 BYO, then there are only 3200 "sets of" one million years. So there can only be 3200 successful leaps of evolution, macro and micro, to make the human being. There are more than 3200 pieces to the human, or any life form.

David Christian (popular evolutionist)

David say humans came to exist 200,000 years ago. So in 200,000 years there has been no evolution. Although the (and "they") claim improved thought and brain power is evidence of evolution. At best, that has zero impact on any form of evolution.

That leaves us with 3.2 BY / 200,000 = 16,000 periods of evolution. Science has "proof" there it takes longer than 200,000 years for even a speck of evolution to occur. Yet there are only 16,000 chances.

N. J. Berrill, Man's Emerging Mind (New Yourk: Fawcett World, 1955), p25

  "For example, N. Berrill can hardly contain himself with his feeling of wonder about the evolution of the horse:
  Little five-towed Eohippus went step by step with clockwork precision over 60 million years to become the large
  one-towed horse."
If it took 60 MY to change a toe, how long does it take to create the entire human body with DNA, blood, cells, proteins, etc?

There are 7 billion people CURRENTLY living. Some say there has been about 14 billion humans EVER. Of the seven billion living today, all are born in the last 100 years. Of those seven billion births there has been many birth defects and "disadvantaged evolutionary attempts" but of the seven billion evolutionary attempts in the last 100 years, not one has been found advantageous let alone passed on to change the species in any way. Are humans at the pinnacle of evolution? Is there no more to life that can evolve? If there has been seven billion births and not a single advantageous natural selection event (macro or micro), how many are needed to actually cause evolution to occur?

E. Coli has four million base pairs in its DNA. How long did it take to evolve four million pairs of DNA that work together successfully? 4.6 BYA / 4 M = 1150 "periods". That's many successful, positive, evolved DNA pairs each year.

It is estimated the body contains 35 trillion cells. How long did it take for the right combination to come together? Can you say, "irreducible complexity?"

How Did Life First Appear (web link)

These rocks give us a picture of life on the early Earth where complex chemicals engaged in ever-changing reactions resulting eventually in the first living organisms. [Statement is theory, not fact.]

The fact that life began on earth is just a natural consequence [A presumption, not an observable, measurable, scientific fact] of the known fundamental laws of chemistry and physics. [The laws of chemistry and physics do not dictate that life must appear] Life was inevitable, once certain conditions prevailed. [A guess/presumption/theory not fact] And evolution itself seems inevitable [A guess/presumption/theory not fact] when we look at the structure and properties of atoms and molecules and how they react in certain environmental conditions. [Lots of presumptions, no observable, measurable, scientific facts]

In general we can say that with the right ingredients (water, hydrogen, ammonia, methane), [1] in the right quantities, [2] at the right temperature, [3] sufficient amounts of time, [4] and an input of energy (lightening or maybe, and increasingly the number one suspect, heat from submerged volcanic vents), [5+maybe's] random chemical reactions can produce molecules that are capable of making copies of themselves by triggering further chemical reactions. These replicating molecules are the building blocks of proteins and nucleic acids and were able to 'feed' from the rich chemicals emitted from land based or hydrothermal vents. [Five presumptions, not observable, measurable, scientific facts; the last statement is a pure, untestable hypothesis, not fact.]

Once the 'first-replicating' molecule was created from these purely random chemical reactions, subsequent developments were no longer based on chance. [An untestable hypothesis, not observable, measurable scientific fact.] Instead, the theory of evolution by natural selection came into effect. As we would expect, [Expect? That's not a scientific fact, that's a presumption] molecules that could replicate began to increase in numbers. And the more 'efficient' replicators, [We just assume these existed, no observable, measurable facts.] those that could compete for the available food and energy in a particular environment, began to flourish, dominate and leave the most descendants. The less efficient died out.

Yea, right. A lot of if's and maybe's. Science is based on measured observation, none of which the above has included or referenced or stated...because no such factual data exists! How and why would a non-living molecule would self-replicate? And if replication was so easy, why was food ever invented/evolved/required? Ditto for sexual reproduction?

Evolutions just say, "this all happened" but have no scientific (observable, measurable) data to back up that claim. Nor can scientists explain the hows and whys. At best science simply says, "it seems like it happened this way." Well, "seems like" is not science, nor proof. God created the universe and sure seems like it happened this way.

More Unexplained Data

If organisms could reproduce asexually initially, why would they evolve into requiring two male and female? To say "diversity" or "prevent disease", etc., is not logical because evolution can resolve that issue and create a better organism that can reproduce itself at will without requiring complex interactions that require two organisms. Two-organism sexual reproduction doesn't make evolutionary sense--it's harder. Being able to reproduce yourself would be advantageous to "survival of the fittest" and produce the most offspring, more quickly, and have a greater chance of survival of that species.

Physiology - How did these develop and why do they still exist?

Just a random sample of physiological processes in the body. How did these come to exist? Why? In what order? Etc? Science has no explanation other than, "just because"...well, that's not science that's a guess...and that's what evolution is.

Quick List of Physiological Traits:

Skin Cells:

Evolution is a GUESS, a theory, not fact, because no facts exist, just guesses--because it didn't happen that way!

God created the heavens and the earth--the universe--and even you! God loves you and knows that you do wrong (you sin). So God sent His Son, Jesus Christ into the world, to be a sacrifice FOR YOU. Now God sees you perfectly and Jesus has paid the price FOR YOU.

That's great news! Your salvation has been earned by Jesus--not by anything you can do! Time to celebrate!

The Bible is clear with God's Good News FOR YOU:

"For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them." (Ephesians 2:8-10)


"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God." (John 3:16-18)